Attention: COVID-19 has significantly affected our normal operations. Read more.

Absolutely Arbitrary Morals

by | Oct 6, 2015 | Humanism | 0 comments

Humanists are often asked how we could make moral decisions without divinely delivered moral absolutes. Really, the more important question is not whether a moral conclusion is absolute but whether a moral conclusion is arbitrary or thoughtfully based on good reasons.

Let’s take the recent visit of the Pope for example. The Pope spoke about the need to address climate change, social justice, peace, cooperation, and human rights related to freedom of thought and immigration. As people who value the process of science, Humanists recognize the need to deal with climate change. The social sciences have demonstrated the benefits of societies where there is a just distribution of resources. People are social by nature and benefit from peace and cooperation. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was established to counter the harm to people’s quality of life coming from the failures to support human rights. To support human rights means supporting principles that we could fairly want applied to both ourselves and others. In short, some of the Pope’s suggestions could be supported with good reasons and were long ago supported by Humanists in documents like the Humanist Manifesto II and III.

And yet, the Pope supports the arbitrary division of people into two genders and the limitation of people’s lives based on that division. Arbitrary policies related to gender have led to women being unable to take leadership roles, same sex couples not having their marriages recognized, and transgendered people being degraded. While many virtues can be supported by authority, traditions, and habitual ways of thinking, there are times that harm comes from the failure to take a more thoughtful approach. It is also doubtful that a thoughtful person would want to be treated as many have by patriarchal systems.

A thoughtful approach to moral issues avoids unnecessary harm to self, others, and the world. A thoughtful approach involves principles that someone would apply both to self and others. People with good reasons for moral conclusions don’t ask questions like “where do you get your morals?” They see we’re all bound by the facts, options, consequences, and feelings of people affected by issues. A better question might be this: how could people reach wholesome moral conclusions without giving things some thought?

Featured Image via

Related Posts

Listen: HCCO Featured on The Other Side Podcast by The Dispatch

Listen: HCCO Featured on The Other Side Podcast by The Dispatch

A few weeks ago Ben Iten and I were invited to be guests on The Other Side podcast, a production of The Dispatch newspaper. The Other Side podcast is a show “on a mission to discuss important cultural and social issues relating to race, culture, gender and equality.”

The Community Report for April 2018

The Community Report for April 2018

Welcome to the April 2018 Community Report for The Humanist Community of Central Ohio. This report–which is a collaborative effort of the board and other volunteers–is meant to share vital metrics of our organization’s health, direction, and progress.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest